About lecturing a course - Revision history

S.protasov: /* 3.11 Academic misconduct policy */

2021-10-10T09:29:39Z

3.11 Academic misconduct policy

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:29, 10 October 2021
Line 412:		Line 412:
	for conferences, . . . )		for conferences, . . . )

−	== ~~3.11~~ Academic misconduct policy ==	+	== Academic misconduct policy ==

−	=== ~~3.11.1~~ Definitions ===	+	=== Definitions ===

	Primary instructor (PI) or professor – course primary instructor. Teaching assistant (TA) –		Primary instructor (PI) or professor – course primary instructor. Teaching assistant (TA) –

S.protasov: /* Penalty */

2021-10-10T09:29:13Z

Penalty

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:29, 10 October 2021
Line 520:		Line 520:
	Note that the following are the minimal actions.		Note that the following are the minimal actions.

−	# Should a student be found to have committed misconduct for the first time, such a student	+	# Should a student be found to have committed misconduct for the first time, such a student shall receive zero points for the particular work (assignment/exam/test/homework)
		⚫	# Should a student be found to have committed misconduct for the second time, the following actions shall be taken:
−	shall receive zero points for the particular work(assignment/exam/test/homework)
⚫	# Should a student be found to have committed misconduct for the second time, the
−	following actions shall be taken:
	## Such a student shall:		## Such a student shall:
	### receive zero points for the course (or courses if 2 cheating instances are detected in different courses);		### receive zero points for the course (or courses if 2 cheating instances are detected in different courses);

S.protasov: /* Procedure from an administration point of view */

2021-10-10T09:28:39Z

Procedure from an administration point of view

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:28, 10 October 2021
Line 513:		Line 513:

	# DoE and SAO get the report about student misconduct.		# DoE and SAO get the report about student misconduct.
−	# SAO tracks the record and asks DoE to act in case violation is not the first (see penalty	+	# SAO tracks the record and asks DoE to act in case violation is not the first (see penalty section).
−	section).
	# In case of student’s appeal, DoE with the help of programmanagers collects a committee.		# In case of student’s appeal, DoE with the help of programmanagers collects a committee.

S.protasov: /* Procedure */

2021-10-10T09:28:24Z

Procedure

@@ Line 488: / Line 488: @@
 the procedure below shall be followed.
-# The instructor shall report the case to DoE and SAO (education@innopolis.ru and
+# The instructor shall report the case to DoE and SAO (education@innopolis.ru and 319@innopolis.ru).
-* The student shall contact the committee and provide the said committee with
+* The student shall contact the committee and provide the said committee with the following materials: a cheating policy for this course/test/exam, students’ papers/code, any other findings, including the student’s arguments.
 * The committee shall study the above materials.
-* The committee can contact the students to listen to their arguments or ask questions.
+* The committee can contact the students to listen to their arguments or ask questions. However, this shall be upon the committee’s discretion.
 ==== Procedure from instructor’s point of view ====

S.protasov: /* 3.11 Academic misconduct policy */

2021-10-10T09:27:08Z

3.11 Academic misconduct policy

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:27, 10 October 2021
Line 422:		Line 422:
	any other member or members of the academic community. Include but not limited by:		any other member or members of the academic community. Include but not limited by:

−	1. cheating (including plagiarism),	+	# cheating (including plagiarism),
		⚫	# fabrication or alteration of information and documents (lies in general),
−
		⚫	# theft,
⚫	2. fabrication or alteration of information and documents (lies in general),
		⚫	# sabotage (lesson disruption, bomb calls, fire alarms).
−
⚫	3. theft,
−
⚫	4. sabotage (lesson disruption, bomb calls, fire alarms).

	Students shall be considered to be cheating if involved in any of the following: using		Students shall be considered to be cheating if involved in any of the following: using
Line 435:		Line 432:
	Plagiarism can take several forms, including but not limited to:		Plagiarism can take several forms, including but not limited to:

−	1. Using the exact words of another student.	+	# Using the exact words of another student.
−	2. Copying and pasting materials from the Internet or other electronic resources without	+	# Copying and pasting materials from the Internet or other electronic resources without
	proper citation, quotation or referencing.		proper citation, quotation or referencing.
−	3. Accepting excessive assistance from another person in writing.	+	# Accepting excessive assistance from another person in writing.
−	4. Writing a computer program that is the same or closely similar to public sources or	+	# Writing a computer program that is the same or closely similar to public sources or
	solutions of other students.		solutions of other students.

Line 447:		Line 444:
	citations, names, titles, terms, and code. Similarity can be measured:		citations, names, titles, terms, and code. Similarity can be measured:

−	1. among students’ works,	+	# among students’ works,
−	2. as well as with other datasets.	+	# as well as with other datasets.

	Similarity checks shall only be applied to long text works in natural or programming language		Similarity checks shall only be applied to long text works in natural or programming language
Line 467:		Line 464:
	319@innopolis.ru). Specify the following:		319@innopolis.ru). Specify the following:

−	1. Student(s) name(s) involved and their roles;	+	# Student(s) name(s) involved and their roles;
−	2. Date and time the case was detected;	+	# Date and time the case was detected;
−	3. Course affected by the situation;	+	# Course affected by the situation;
−	4. Short description of the situation. Please refer to this policy or other policy documents	+	# Short description of the situation. Please refer to this policy or other policy documents
	which you use to identify the misconduct.		which you use to identify the misconduct.

Line 491:		Line 488:
	the procedure below shall be followed.		the procedure below shall be followed.

−	1. The instructor shall report the case to DoE and SAO (education@innopolis.ru and	+	# The instructor shall report the case to DoE and SAO (education@innopolis.ru and
	319@innopolis.ru).		319@innopolis.ru).
−	2. The instructor shall inform the suspected students about the above finding separately,	+	# The instructor shall inform the suspected students about the above finding separately,
	and discuss this incident. They shall be penalized as per the recommendations below and a		and discuss this incident. They shall be penalized as per the recommendations below and a
	report will be submitted to DoE outlining these decisions. In case of copying from each		report will be submitted to DoE outlining these decisions. In case of copying from each
	other—both students shall be penalized. The actions of the instructor are considered		other—both students shall be penalized. The actions of the instructor are considered
	final.		final.
−	3. In the event of an appeal to the DoE, the student must present a clear written rationale	+	# In the event of an appeal to the DoE, the student must present a clear written rationale
	for why the decision was in error. If the DoE agrees that the student appeal has merit then		for why the decision was in error. If the DoE agrees that the student appeal has merit then
	an appeal committee is formed of one student representative, the course PI, and an		an appeal committee is formed of one student representative, the course PI, and an
Line 519:		Line 516:
	==== Procedure from instructor’s point of view ====		==== Procedure from instructor’s point of view ====

−	1. Instructor reports the violation case to DoE and SAO.	+	# Instructor reports the violation case to DoE and SAO.
−	2. Instructor notifies students involved (can be BCC in report email).	+	# Instructor notifies students involved (can be BCC in report email).
−	3. In case of student’s appeal, instructor may be invited to participate in committee.	+	# In case of student’s appeal, instructor may be invited to participate in committee.

	==== Procedure from student’s point of view ====		==== Procedure from student’s point of view ====

−	1. The student gets a notification about academic misconduct.	+	# The student gets a notification about academic misconduct.
−	2. The student may appeal. He/she collects the documents (3.a) and submits to DoE and	+	# The student may appeal. He/she collects the documents (3.a) and submits to DoE and
	SAO.		SAO.

	==== Procedure from an administration point of view ====		==== Procedure from an administration point of view ====

−	1. DoE and SAO get the report about student misconduct.	+	# DoE and SAO get the report about student misconduct.
−	2. SAO tracks the record and asks DoE to act in case violation is not the first (see penalty	+	# SAO tracks the record and asks DoE to act in case violation is not the first (see penalty
	section).		section).
		⚫	# In case of student’s appeal, DoE with the help of programmanagers collects a committee.
−
⚫	3. In case of student’s appeal, DoE with the help of programmanagers collects a committee.

	=== Penalty ===		=== Penalty ===
Line 541:		Line 537:
	Note that the following are the minimal actions.		Note that the following are the minimal actions.

−	1. Should a student be found to have committed misconduct for the first time, such a student	+	# Should a student be found to have committed misconduct for the first time, such a student
	shall receive zero points for the particular work(assignment/exam/test/homework)		shall receive zero points for the particular work(assignment/exam/test/homework)
−	2. Should a student be found to have committed misconduct for the second time, the	+	# Should a student be found to have committed misconduct for the second time, the
	following actions shall be taken:		following actions shall be taken:
		+	## Such a student shall:
−	* ~~Such a student shall: (a)~~receive zero points for the course (or courses if 2 cheating instances are detected in different courses); ~~(b) be sent to retake.~~	+	### receive zero points for the course (or courses if 2 cheating instances are detected in different courses);
⚫	* An official warning shall be issued for the said student.
		+	### be sent to retake.
⚫	3. Should a student be found to have committed misconduct for the third time (without
		⚫	## An official warning shall be issued for the said student.
−	respect to the course), such a student shall be expelled fromInnopolis University.
		⚫	# Should a student be found to have committed misconduct for the third time (without respect to the course), such a student shall be expelled from Innopolis University.

	In the event that the actions were of a grievous nature, e.g. a student using a work for hire		In the event that the actions were of a grievous nature, e.g. a student using a work for hire

S.protasov: /* 3.11.1 Definitions */

2021-10-10T09:24:53Z

3.11.1 Definitions

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:24, 10 October 2021
Line 421:		Line 421:
	unfair academic advantage for oneself or an unfair academic advantage or disadvantage for		unfair academic advantage for oneself or an unfair academic advantage or disadvantage for
	any other member or members of the academic community. Include but not limited by:		any other member or members of the academic community. Include but not limited by:
		+
	1. cheating (including plagiarism),		1. cheating (including plagiarism),
		+
	2. fabrication or alteration of information and documents (lies in general),		2. fabrication or alteration of information and documents (lies in general),
		+
	3. theft,		3. theft,
		+
	4. sabotage (lesson disruption, bomb calls, fire alarms).		4. sabotage (lesson disruption, bomb calls, fire alarms).

S.protasov: /* Penalty */

2021-10-10T09:24:24Z

Penalty

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:24, 10 October 2021
Line 541:		Line 541:
	2. Should a student be found to have committed misconduct for the second time, the		2. Should a student be found to have committed misconduct for the second time, the
	following actions shall be taken:		following actions shall be taken:
		⚫	* Such a student shall: (a)receive zero points for the course (or courses if 2 cheating instances are detected in different courses); (b) be sent to retake.
−	* Such a student shall:
⚫	– receive zero points for the course (or courses if 2 cheating instances are
−	detected in different courses);
−	– be sent to retake.
	* An official warning shall be issued for the said student.		* An official warning shall be issued for the said student.
	3. Should a student be found to have committed misconduct for the third time (without		3. Should a student be found to have committed misconduct for the third time (without

S.protasov: /* Penalty */

2021-10-10T09:23:53Z

Penalty

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:23, 10 October 2021
Line 542:		Line 542:
	following actions shall be taken:		following actions shall be taken:
	* Such a student shall:		* Such a student shall:
−	– receive zero points for the course (or courses if 2 cheating instances are	+	– receive zero points for the course (or courses if 2 cheating instances are
	detected in different courses);		detected in different courses);
−	– be sent to retake.	+	– be sent to retake.
	* An official warning shall be issued for the said student.		* An official warning shall be issued for the said student.
	3. Should a student be found to have committed misconduct for the third time (without		3. Should a student be found to have committed misconduct for the third time (without

S.protasov at 09:23, 10 October 2021

2021-10-10T09:23:24Z

10.90.136.11 at 13:15, 8 September 2021

2021-09-08T13:15:04Z

@@ Line 526: / Line 526: @@
 . In case of student’s appeal, instructor may be invited to participate in committee.
-.11.3.2 Procedure from student’s point of view
+==== Procedure from student’s point of view ====
 . The student gets a notification about academic misconduct.